7,189
edits
User talk:Force Fire: Difference between revisions
m
Reverted edits by Morelull101 (talk) to last revision by Abcboy
Marshtompert (talk | contribs) |
m (Reverted edits by Morelull101 (talk) to last revision by Abcboy) |
||
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
::::::::::::At Force Fire, as I have said numerous times, I don't consider it trivial because the whole point of a physical move is its physicality, so to show how it looks, despite it not being used yet, since it hasn't made contact and I don't think it's a perfectly fine image, because it does lot a bit blurry and the one with Avalugg has a logo, so why can't one without a logo be added? You said that logo omissions are fine, but for some reason me adding one that doesn't have one and that shows one of the main cornerstones of a physical move being used isn't fine? Why does that make sense? [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 16:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ::::::::::::At Force Fire, as I have said numerous times, I don't consider it trivial because the whole point of a physical move is its physicality, so to show how it looks, despite it not being used yet, since it hasn't made contact and I don't think it's a perfectly fine image, because it does lot a bit blurry and the one with Avalugg has a logo, so why can't one without a logo be added? You said that logo omissions are fine, but for some reason me adding one that doesn't have one and that shows one of the main cornerstones of a physical move being used isn't fine? Why does that make sense? [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 16:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::::::And that's your opinion. Bottom line is, you can't just an perfectly fine image because ''you'' don't like. The logo in the Avalugg image was obscured by the flame, so I didn't see it on first notice. If you want to change it because it has a logo, fine. But for the Thunderbolt image (which was why I brought this whole thing up in the first place) is perfectly fine the way it is and does not need to be changed.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 07:04, 19 August 2016 (UTC) | :::::::::::::And that's your opinion. Bottom line is, you can't just an perfectly fine image because ''you'' don't like. The logo in the Avalugg image was obscured by the flame, so I didn't see it on first notice. If you want to change it because it has a logo, fine. But for the Thunderbolt image (which was why I brought this whole thing up in the first place) is perfectly fine the way it is and does not need to be changed.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 07:04, 19 August 2016 (UTC) | ||