User talk:Force Fire: Difference between revisions

m (Reverted edits by Morelull101 (talk) to last revision by Abcboy)
(→‎Bulbapedia block: new section)
Line 97: Line 97:
::::::::::::At Force Fire, as I have said numerous times, I don't consider it trivial because the whole point of a physical move is its physicality, so to show how it looks, despite it not being used yet, since it hasn't made contact and I don't think it's a perfectly fine image, because it does lot a bit blurry and the one with Avalugg has a logo, so why can't one without a logo be added? You said that logo omissions are fine, but for some reason me adding one that doesn't have one and that shows one of the main cornerstones of a physical move being used isn't fine? Why does that make sense? [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 16:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
::::::::::::At Force Fire, as I have said numerous times, I don't consider it trivial because the whole point of a physical move is its physicality, so to show how it looks, despite it not being used yet, since it hasn't made contact and I don't think it's a perfectly fine image, because it does lot a bit blurry and the one with Avalugg has a logo, so why can't one without a logo be added? You said that logo omissions are fine, but for some reason me adding one that doesn't have one and that shows one of the main cornerstones of a physical move being used isn't fine? Why does that make sense? [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 16:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
:::::::::::::And that's your opinion. Bottom line is, you can't just an perfectly fine image because ''you'' don't like. The logo in the Avalugg image was obscured by the flame, so I didn't see it on first notice. If you want to change it because it has a logo, fine. But for the Thunderbolt image (which was why I brought this whole thing up in the first place) is perfectly fine the way it is and does not need to be changed.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 07:04, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
:::::::::::::And that's your opinion. Bottom line is, you can't just an perfectly fine image because ''you'' don't like. The logo in the Avalugg image was obscured by the flame, so I didn't see it on first notice. If you want to change it because it has a logo, fine. But for the Thunderbolt image (which was why I brought this whole thing up in the first place) is perfectly fine the way it is and does not need to be changed.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 07:04, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
== Bulbapedia block ==
Hello. I have to use your Archives talk page because I can't email you (i.e. the function “email this user” is hidden).
Because of my block on Bulbapedia, I have just to say you that I did those edits on [[bp:User:Bikini Miltank|Bikini Miltank]] and [[bp:User:abcboy|abcboy]]'s userpages justly. The reason I edited Bikini Miltank's userpage is that their userpage, although it had Babel tags, the userpage '''was not placed in the [[bp:Category:User en|prop]][[bp:Category:User en-N|er cat]][[bp:Category:User ja|egor]][[bp:Category:User ja-1|ies.]]''' The reason I edited abcboy's userpage is that he itself introduces in the title section with his username being lowercase. This is also the case on the project pages that have abcboy's username on them.
'''Block made by [[bp:User:Force Fire|Force Fire]]'''
Start of block: 06:13, 23 October 2019
Expiration of block: 05:13, 6 November 2019
Intended blocked user: TheICTLiker4
IP address: 89.74.214.203
Block ID: #59613
Reason: ''Insubordination''
Thank you for reading. --[[User:TheICTLiker4|<span style="color:#888">'''TheICT'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/TheICTLiker4|<span style="color:#666">'''Liker4'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:TheICTLiker4|<span style="color:#444">'''piszże do mnie'''</span>]]</sup> 18:14, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
205

edits