1,651
edits
User talk:Force Fire: Difference between revisions
→Request
Playerking95 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
::::::::::::At ShallowShaddoll: I didn't enter into anyone else's conversation, this was one I started with Force Fire because I wanted to talk to him about something, so there's no need for any "face-palm" and if there is, it's for not knowing how to spell the word "what". 2. I never harassed you, I was just stating my opinion and you attacked me by quoting what Force Fire said to me and not even bothering to read the other thing that he said and now you are injecting yourself here, when it isn't necessary, so yes, I am the victim here. | ::::::::::::At ShallowShaddoll: I didn't enter into anyone else's conversation, this was one I started with Force Fire because I wanted to talk to him about something, so there's no need for any "face-palm" and if there is, it's for not knowing how to spell the word "what". 2. I never harassed you, I was just stating my opinion and you attacked me by quoting what Force Fire said to me and not even bothering to read the other thing that he said and now you are injecting yourself here, when it isn't necessary, so yes, I am the victim here. | ||
::::::::::::At Force Fire, as I have said numerous times, I don't consider it trivial because the whole point of a physical move is its physicality, so to show how it looks, despite it not being used yet, since it hasn't made contact and I don't think it's a perfectly fine image, because it does lot a bit blurry and the one with Avalugg has a logo, so why can't one without a logo be added? You said that logo omissions are fine, but for some reason me adding one that doesn't have one and that shows one of the main cornerstones of a physical move being used isn't fine? Why does that make sense? [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 16:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ::::::::::::At Force Fire, as I have said numerous times, I don't consider it trivial because the whole point of a physical move is its physicality, so to show how it looks, despite it not being used yet, since it hasn't made contact and I don't think it's a perfectly fine image, because it does lot a bit blurry and the one with Avalugg has a logo, so why can't one without a logo be added? You said that logo omissions are fine, but for some reason me adding one that doesn't have one and that shows one of the main cornerstones of a physical move being used isn't fine? Why does that make sense? [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 16:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::::::And that's your opinion. Bottom line is, you can't just an perfectly fine image because ''you'' don't like. The logo in the Avalugg image was obscured by the flame, so I didn't see it on first notice. If you want to change it because it has a logo, fine. But for the Thunderbolt image (which was why I brought this whole thing up in the first place) is perfectly fine the way it is and does not need to be changed.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 07:04, 19 August 2016 (UTC) | |||