1,292
edits
User talk:Force Fire: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
Playerking95 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
:"Okay, you are not apart of this conversation, so don't enter it.". But you did. *facepalm* Whut? You're harrasing me and completely ignoring everyones opinions and suddenly you're the victim..? Whutt!? O.O--[[User:ShallowShaddoll|ShallowShaddoll]] ([[User talk:ShallowShaddoll|talk]]) 15:56, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | :"Okay, you are not apart of this conversation, so don't enter it.". But you did. *facepalm* Whut? You're harrasing me and completely ignoring everyones opinions and suddenly you're the victim..? Whutt!? O.O--[[User:ShallowShaddoll|ShallowShaddoll]] ([[User talk:ShallowShaddoll|talk]]) 15:56, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::::It is trivial if that's your sole purpose of replacing a perfectly fine image. That's basically all it boils down to. Don't change a perfectly fine image to fit your views. The only reason you would change a perfectly fine image is if it's taken from a newer series or if the animation is different from before.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 16:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | :::::::::::It is trivial if that's your sole purpose of replacing a perfectly fine image. That's basically all it boils down to. Don't change a perfectly fine image to fit your views. The only reason you would change a perfectly fine image is if it's taken from a newer series or if the animation is different from before.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 16:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::::::::::At ShallowShaddoll: I didn't enter into anyone else's conversation, this was one I started with Force Fire because I wanted to talk to him about something, so there's no need for any "face-palm" and if there is, it's for not knowing how to spell the word "what". 2. I never harassed you, I was just stating my opinion and you attacked me by quoting what Force Fire said to me and not even bothering to read the other thing that he said and now you are injecting yourself here, when it isn't necessary, so yes, I am the victim here. | |||
::::::::::::At Force Fire, as I have said numerous times, I don't consider it trivial because the whole point of a physical move is its physicality, so to show how it looks, despite it not being used yet, since it hasn't made contact and I don't think it's a perfectly fine image, because it does lot a bit blurry and the one with Avalugg has a logo, so why can't one without a logo be added? You said that logo omissions are fine, but for some reason me adding one that doesn't have one and that shows one of the main cornerstones of a physical move being used isn't fine? Why does that make sense? [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 16:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | |||