205
edits
User talk:Force Fire: Difference between revisions
→Request
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
::::::::(edit conflict) For what it's worth, I agree with ShallowShaddoll that your proposed new version of the Flame Charge image is actually of a '''worse''' quality than the previous version (the image as a whole is blurrer, and contains compression artefacts), so I don't see the improvement that you are suggesting. Had it been an image of objectively higher quality '''and''' also depicts the move making contact, fine; however, this is not the case. This is a wiki, and as the tagline of Bulbapedia suggests, "community-driven", so I will weigh in on such matters as I please, until another staff member tells me otherwise. | ::::::::(edit conflict) For what it's worth, I agree with ShallowShaddoll that your proposed new version of the Flame Charge image is actually of a '''worse''' quality than the previous version (the image as a whole is blurrer, and contains compression artefacts), so I don't see the improvement that you are suggesting. Had it been an image of objectively higher quality '''and''' also depicts the move making contact, fine; however, this is not the case. This is a wiki, and as the tagline of Bulbapedia suggests, "community-driven", so I will weigh in on such matters as I please, until another staff member tells me otherwise. | ||
::::::::"he never said it was only if the previous image was of poor quality" - at this point, I think you are simply [[wp:WP:LAWYER|wikilawyering]]. Do you really think that "making contact" trumps "technical quality", and if so, do we really have to go to the ridiculous extent of codifying this in policy? [[User:Chenzw|Chenzw]] ([[User talk:Chenzw|talk]]) 15:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ::::::::"he never said it was only if the previous image was of poor quality" - at this point, I think you are simply [[wp:WP:LAWYER|wikilawyering]]. Do you really think that "making contact" trumps "technical quality", and if so, do we really have to go to the ridiculous extent of codifying this in policy? [[User:Chenzw|Chenzw]] ([[User talk:Chenzw|talk]]) 15:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
:@Playerking: You cannot force people out of conversations. If you don not know how wikias work in general, maybe you should not be contributing in one?--[[User:ShallowShaddoll|ShallowShaddoll]] ([[User talk:ShallowShaddoll|talk]]) 15:45, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ::::::::@Playerking: You cannot force people out of conversations. If you don not know how wikias work in general, maybe you should not be contributing in one?--[[User:ShallowShaddoll|ShallowShaddoll]] ([[User talk:ShallowShaddoll|talk]]) 15:45, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::At Force Fire: But making contact isn't something trivial, or at the very least, shouldn't be considered. | |||
:::::::::At Chenzw: For what it's worth, I don't care who you agree with and this is between me and Force Fire, since I was asking him something and not you and as I've said, the image isn't worse and quite frankly, the image from the Wulfric battle is of a pretty blurry quality to me and artefacts aren't that important, so stop nitpicking at things that don't need to be and as I've said, the conversation isn't between him, myself and you. I want a moderator's voice on this, not a normal user's. | |||
:::::::::At Shallowshaddoll or whatever, I've been here a lot longer than you, or at the very least have been editing here longer than you have, so I know what a wikia is, but as I've said, I came her for one persons voice and that isn't yours and don't suggest for me to leave, because I'm just going to suggest for you to leave, because this is a community and communities should respect peoples opinions and should not harassing people, which I feel you are doing. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 15:54, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
:"Okay, you are not apart of this conversation, so don't enter it.". But you did. *facepalm* Whut? You're harrasing me and completely ignoring everyones opinions and suddenly you're the victim..? Whutt!? O.O--[[User:ShallowShaddoll|ShallowShaddoll]] ([[User talk:ShallowShaddoll|talk]]) 15:56, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ::::::::::"Okay, you are not apart of this conversation, so don't enter it.". But you did. *facepalm* Whut? You're harrasing me and completely ignoring everyones opinions and suddenly you're the victim..? Whutt!? O.O--[[User:ShallowShaddoll|ShallowShaddoll]] ([[User talk:ShallowShaddoll|talk]]) 15:56, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
<small>(resetting indent)</small>It is trivial if that's your sole purpose of replacing a perfectly fine image. That's basically all it boils down to. Don't change a perfectly fine image to fit your views. The only reason you would change a perfectly fine image is if it's taken from a newer series or if the animation is different from before.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 16:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
:At ShallowShaddoll: I didn't enter into anyone else's conversation, this was one I started with Force Fire because I wanted to talk to him about something, so there's no need for any "face-palm" and if there is, it's for not knowing how to spell the word "what". 2. I never harassed you, I was just stating my opinion and you attacked me by quoting what Force Fire said to me and not even bothering to read the other thing that he said and now you are injecting yourself here, when it isn't necessary, so yes, I am the victim here. | |||
::At Force Fire, as I have said numerous times, I don't consider it trivial because the whole point of a physical move is its physicality, so to show how it looks, despite it not being used yet, since it hasn't made contact and I don't think it's a perfectly fine image, because it does lot a bit blurry and the one with Avalugg has a logo, so why can't one without a logo be added? You said that logo omissions are fine, but for some reason me adding one that doesn't have one and that shows one of the main cornerstones of a physical move being used isn't fine? Why does that make sense? [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 16:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::And that's your opinion. Bottom line is, you can't just an perfectly fine image because ''you'' don't like. The logo in the Avalugg image was obscured by the flame, so I didn't see it on first notice. If you want to change it because it has a logo, fine. But for the Thunderbolt image (which was why I brought this whole thing up in the first place) is perfectly fine the way it is and does not need to be changed.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 07:04, 19 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Bulbapedia block == | == Bulbapedia block == | ||