User talk:PsychicRider/Archive1: Difference between revisions

m (Unprotected "User talk:PsychicRider": Ok there)
Line 225: Line 225:
::::Look, don't accuse me of lying. I know when an image looks shitty. Just because it's bigger, does not mean it's better. Quality isn't about size, it's about whether it or not it looks like it was a picture taken from your TV or some horrible youtube video. Your images are so blurry and look horrible, anyone can vouch for that. You need to stop taking things so personally, we're just doing our job. Which images do you want back? You could at least link to them so I can do something about it. <span style="color:red">—<small>♥</small></span> <b>[[User:Jello|<span style="color:orange;">Jello</span>]][[User Talk:Jello|<span style="color:#3FA9D0;"><sup>talk</sup></span>]]</b> 00:08, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
::::Look, don't accuse me of lying. I know when an image looks shitty. Just because it's bigger, does not mean it's better. Quality isn't about size, it's about whether it or not it looks like it was a picture taken from your TV or some horrible youtube video. Your images are so blurry and look horrible, anyone can vouch for that. You need to stop taking things so personally, we're just doing our job. Which images do you want back? You could at least link to them so I can do something about it. <span style="color:red">—<small>♥</small></span> <b>[[User:Jello|<span style="color:orange;">Jello</span>]][[User Talk:Jello|<span style="color:#3FA9D0;"><sup>talk</sup></span>]]</b> 00:08, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
:::::I deleted it cause it wasn't being used. If it was, I wouldn't have. Check your facts first, thanks. Second, coming to an admin with an attitude like yours won't get me to reconsider it at all. Third, the image that is being used in the article is newer and shows a more accurate depiction of Charizard, focusing on him and the body, because that is what the article is about. Fourth, your image has an unnecessary border on it. There is nothing wrong with the image being used. Fifth, Nate deleted it. Scream at him, not me. Come at me like this again and you'll face a block cause I am not going to tolerate this kind of behavior. Thanks. --[[User:PsychicRider|<span style="color:#78C850;">'''Psy'''</span>]][[User talk:PsychicRider|<sub style="color:#F85888;">'''ライダー'''</sub>]]''[[Special:Contributions/PsychicRider|<span style="color:#C4E673;">'''☮'''</span>]]'' 00:10, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
:::::I deleted it cause it wasn't being used. If it was, I wouldn't have. Check your facts first, thanks. Second, coming to an admin with an attitude like yours won't get me to reconsider it at all. Third, the image that is being used in the article is newer and shows a more accurate depiction of Charizard, focusing on him and the body, because that is what the article is about. Fourth, your image has an unnecessary border on it. There is nothing wrong with the image being used. Fifth, Nate deleted it. Scream at him, not me. Come at me like this again and you'll face a block cause I am not going to tolerate this kind of behavior. Thanks. --[[User:PsychicRider|<span style="color:#78C850;">'''Psy'''</span>]][[User talk:PsychicRider|<sub style="color:#F85888;">'''ライダー'''</sub>]]''[[Special:Contributions/PsychicRider|<span style="color:#C4E673;">'''☮'''</span>]]'' 00:10, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
::::::Only cause an image is newer its better? look at it, and you will see that charizard is totaly bad designed! the image is not bad at all, but charizard look "drawed" by a 5 years kid!  And you should give a chance to images of original series, i'm sure that you know that it was the biggest serie of anime and lot of pokemons have good images from there. and about my image the border its almost invisible, and when you put in the article they become invisible. aonther thing, its is good the image stay in charizard main article cause the bulbapedia bigger diversity in images. if you don't want use my image, could you at least find another image of charizard in anime? the current one is awful!  [[User:Pedraito|Pedraito]] 00:55, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
118

edits