7,582
edits
User talk:Playerking95: Difference between revisions
m
Undo revision 523382 by FinnishPokéFan92 (talk) Banned or not, that's not ever necessary.
Playerking95 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (Undo revision 523382 by FinnishPokéFan92 (talk) Banned or not, that's not ever necessary.) |
||
| (26 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
"'''Why does it matter if it's making contact?''' The point of the image is to show what the move looks like in the anime, not what effect it has on the opponent.".--[[User:ShallowShaddoll|ShallowShaddoll]] ([[User talk:ShallowShaddoll|talk]]) 14:25, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | "'''Why does it matter if it's making contact?''' The point of the image is to show what the move looks like in the anime, not what effect it has on the opponent.".--[[User:ShallowShaddoll|ShallowShaddoll]] ([[User talk:ShallowShaddoll|talk]]) 14:25, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
: As I've already alluded to. "Physical moves like High Jump Kick are fine" and "when I say physical moves I mean moves that make contact" [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 14:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | : As I've already alluded to. "Physical moves like High Jump Kick are fine" and "when I say physical moves I mean moves that make contact" [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 14:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
:: And adding a pic where you can see two different moves as a move of 1 -mon whose body is barely recognizable? Whut.?--[[User:ShallowShaddoll|ShallowShaddoll]] ([[User talk:ShallowShaddoll|talk]]) 14:29, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::Except that it's not barely recognisable, anyone can see it. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 14:30, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Alva's moves == | |||
Hey can you tell me why pictures like Alva Vivillon Energy Ball and Alva Pyroar Flamethrower need to be uploaded. I can't see where they would be needed on Bulbapedia.--[[User:Rahl|Rahl]] ([[User talk:Rahl|talk]]) 11:59, 7 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
:Because other characters of the day's Pokemon have pictures of their Pokemon using moves here as well? [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 14:20, 7 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
::Well yes but they are only characters of the day. If the move is not being put to use somewhere why bother? They aren't important characters.--[[User:Rahl|Rahl]] ([[User talk:Rahl|talk]]) 16:10, 7 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Permanent block warning == | |||
Despite having been warned and blocked [[#Upload warring, final warning|numerous times]], you have once again engaged in an [[:File:Jessie Mimikyu.png|upload war]] without bothering to contact the other person or an Administrator to intervene. As Kogoro mentioned, the next time you are blocked for this reason you will be blocked from Bulbagarden Archives permanently. - [[Bp:User:Chosen|<span style="color:#F85888">Chosen</span>]] <span style="color:#6890F0">of</span> [[User talk:Chosen|<span style="color:#F8D030">Mana</span>]] 18:47, 10 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:But one reverting isn't edit warring. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 05:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
::Playerking95... The long and short of it is, you are on very thin ice. If you can't learn to err on the side of caution, you will find yourself receiving your final block. I'll leave you with this: if you disagree with what an image should be, '''''talk''''' to someone and '''leave the image alone'''. Perhaps that will be frustrating for you, but if you wish to continue contributing here, that's the best chance you'll have. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 17:09, 11 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::As I said, I didn't edit war. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 17:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
::::This is not at all a discussion of whether you were edit warring, Playerking95. I'm trying to make clear what we expect since you don't seem to get it. But if you want to continue to insist on that, then I'll leave you to your mistakes. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 17:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::::If this isn't about that, then what's the point of the discussion, because I know what you said and I did nothing wrong, so there are no mistakes. I uploaded an image and reverted another, which didn't seem to fit the criteria for what the image should be and when it was reverted back, I took what was said on advisement and then I came across a better image. What was I supposed to do once I found an image that everyone would be happy with, just leave it alone. What's wrony with finding an all compromising image? [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 17:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
::::::The original point was giving you one (more) final warning and chance to mend your behavior before we entirely exhaust our patience and resort to your final ban here. | |||
::::::I'll suggest this regarding your conflict on the image for Jessie's Mimikyu (this is all IMO by the way): when someone first changed the image, there were two good options for you: 1) start a discussion with the person or with a staff member or on the file's talk page, or 2) immediately find and upload a better image. If you chose the latter option and someone changed it again, it would be a VERY bad idea for you to revert that or even try to choose another image. (Just in case: Please don't mistake this as exact rules that everyone must follow. Right now, this advice is tailored very specifically to your circumstances (which ''are'' special and arguing it will get you nowhere). We may be happy if everyone followed such guidelines, but I'm talking about ''you'' here, not anyone else.) The long and short of it is, you need to learn to discuss. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 17:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Those weren't the only options, because there's nothing wrong with reverting. I'm allowed to revert and no one has said otherwise and I don't think I should be made to follow any specific rule, when I've done nothing wrong. I have DISCUSSED before and that's after I have reverted an image (and rightfully so, when the other image wasn't exactly up to standards) and that change was reverted by someone else. One revert isn't an edit war, especially when it was meant to be something final, and there was a belief that it wouldn't be reverted and turn into a war, which, if it did, as I said, there would be a discussion. So, I don't see how one little revert is doing anything any harm, when others are allowed to and others have done the same thing I have, reverting images multiple times in an edit war fashion, which I don't do anymore. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 01:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
Playerking... please take a look at the history section of the Jessie's Mimikyu file and tell me how many times '''your''' name appears with the word '''reverted''' next to it. You have '''clearly''' not reverted only once. Yes, there is everything wrong with reverting, especially in your case when you're a serial reverter. You are allowed to replace an image, but '''not''' revert someone just because you have a different opinion. You have '''not''' discussed anything with Rahl. You '''never''' discuss anything with '''anyone'''. You just run around reverting around because you just simply have the power to. And yes, you are made to follow a specific rule for you because "taking stuff to the talk page rather then reverting" seems to be such an abstract concept for you to comprehend that it had to come down to this. Sorry for being so hard, but this is the kind of harsh reality you need before you get yourself permanently blocked.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 06:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:You're wrong. I have discussed things, so this isn't some "abstract concept" and don't act like it is. And I have looked at the file in question. I reverted each image once. I uploaded an image, it got changed, so I reverted it and then it got changed and I uploaded another image, that got changed, so I reverted that image once. Reverting once isn't a problem. So, no, I shouldn't be made to follow a specific rule when I'm not edit warring anymore and I'm not the only one involved in these things. And if I haven't discussed things with specific members, then that is simply because doing so would be a waste of time when they stupidly are targeting me and won't listen to what I have to say and if they ever happen to magically listen, then I'll ride a flying pig. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 07:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
::No. You have not discussed things. Otherwise, you would've went to Rahl's page and asked why his image was good. But that's a waste of time, so lets waste more time edit warring. "I reverted '''each''' image once". Is that not edit warring? Yes... yes it is. What you described is the very essence of edit warring. Just because you reverted each image once doesn't mean you've only reverted once, that's not how it works. You're under the presumption that this rule is from this incident. It's not. It's from '''every single time you've edit warred on the Archives and the Wiki'''. We didn't look at this incident and say "lets make a rule", we looked at your '''entire history''' of edit warring and came to that conclusion. And users don't listen because you don't engage with them and ask why they reverted you. Someone has to take the initiative, if they're not going to come to you, go to them.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 09:04, 12 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::No, I have discussed, so accept that, because that IS the truth and anything else is a blatant lie. Also, that is not edit warring. One revert is not a war. And I didn't say that it was because of this, especially when I didn't do anything wrong on that file's name and you're acting like all I do is reverting, which again, you are wrong about. And again, you're wrong, they don't engage because they won't listed. I'm not the only one that has to engage first, because as I have said time and TIME again, I'm not the only one in this. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 09:08, 12 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
::::I don't see you discussing the Jessie's Mimikyu file on Rahl's talk page. I don't know how you're defining what an edit war is, because reverting every time someone uploads a new image '''is''' edit warring. I didn't say all you do is edit war, but how many times you've edit warred. Like I said, someone has to take the '''initiative'''. If they're not going to go to you, '''YOU''' go to '''THEM'''.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 09:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
== PG18 == | |||
I see you're uploading images of {{bp|PG18}} too, but one important thing: if you see that someone else is uploading similar pictures as you are, '''don't start racing to get to do it first!''' Your links are often incomplete, your Charizard picture (which I, by the way, personally consider to have an incomplete title and thus be inferior to my version despite yours "being here first") completely lacks description. I am a bit older than you, judging by your user name, so try to have a liiitle more respect towards those with more experience than you, okay? --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 18:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:1: Please, this is no race. I decided to upload them. Just because you are also doing that, it doesn't mean it's a race. 2: Your title does not make it better. 3: Yes, if it was uploaded first, it counts. With that logic, you can now upload an image of Ash's Pikachu under a different file name and we should just use that. 4: A little more respect? Sure, when you give some first and you DO NOT have more experience than me. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 18:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
::Sorry, it's late evening where I am so I'm a bit tired, and I just fell into one of my impulsive rants over there. I apologize. You must've been uploading images unknowing of my uploads and vice versa, so no grudges held. Errare humanum est. --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 19:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC) Ps. A friendly little hint: at least most of Bulbapedia's link templates work on this site as well, such as the P-template for (Pokémon)-pages. | |||
:::Yeah, I'm not buying your fake nice guy act when you've been nothing but rude to me for the last year or so. Please revert your edit to PG18's file as it does not meet the criteria, image wise and size wise. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 06:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Permanent Block == | |||
After careful consideration of your recent and past activities on the Bulbagarden Archives, it has been decided that you are no longer welcome to contribute to this section of Bulbagarden. You constantly get into revert wars, you frequently get into fights with other users where you disregard other opinions with prejudice and insist that nobody's uploads can be better than yours, you twist staff words to try and get your way, as well as several other behaviors completely contrary to the goals of the Bulbagarden Archives. The camel's back is sufficiently broken here, so your account is now permanently blocked. - [[User:Kogoro|'''<span class="sc" style="color:#DA70D6;">Kogoro</span>''']] '''-''' [[User talk:Kogoro|'''<span class="sc" style="color:#FFB6C1;">Talk to me</span>''']] - 09:00, 24 December 2016 (UTC) | |||