8,517
edits
User talk:Masatoshi: Difference between revisions
m
→3DS complications
| Line 415: | Line 415: | ||
:Uh, what does the 3DS have to do with this? Also, you could have tried mailing me through the e-mail feature. We aren't talking about that edit war, we're talking about this one. You and Darthrai both reverted each other a total of seven times (that means, you reverting him, him reverting you, you reverting him and so on), giving you both a week, but since you already participated in another edit war with Satoshi before (and blocked because of that), the time is doubled due reincidence. I don't get what's so hard to understand. [[User:Masatoshi|<span style="color: #224a9a"><b><span style="color: #2b5fc7">M</span>asatoshi</b></span>]][[User_talk:Masatoshi|<span style="color: #118eb2"><sub><small>''talk''</small></sub></span>]] 06:15, 30 January 2012 (UTC) | :Uh, what does the 3DS have to do with this? Also, you could have tried mailing me through the e-mail feature. We aren't talking about that edit war, we're talking about this one. You and Darthrai both reverted each other a total of seven times (that means, you reverting him, him reverting you, you reverting him and so on), giving you both a week, but since you already participated in another edit war with Satoshi before (and blocked because of that), the time is doubled due reincidence. I don't get what's so hard to understand. [[User:Masatoshi|<span style="color: #224a9a"><b><span style="color: #2b5fc7">M</span>asatoshi</b></span>]][[User_talk:Masatoshi|<span style="color: #118eb2"><sub><small>''talk''</small></sub></span>]] 06:15, 30 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
::The 3DS is what I was using to access this page... You said you blocked me based on the first edit war, so yes, the first one has everythig to do with this "Second block due to it." The first block was 3 days. You were supposed to double that. Not the week you gave Darthrai AFTER you blocked me. You are showing an extreme case of bias and I don't see why you should've blocked me in the first place. That means you're placing the blame on me when I specifically used the talkpage to prevent an edit war. Look man, tomorrow's my birthday, so I'd really like it if my birthday present here is that my block is lifted. Considering no staff member ever gave me a warning for any of my three blocks, and didn't tell me I did anything wrong until after I was blocked, that seems very much like an abuse of power. 3*2 '''does not equal''' 14--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 12:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC) | ::The 3DS is what I was using to access this page... You said you blocked me based on the first edit war, so yes, the first one has everythig to do with this "Second block due to it." The first block was 3 days. You were supposed to double that. Not the week you gave Darthrai AFTER you blocked me. You are showing an extreme case of bias and I don't see why you should've blocked me in the first place. That means you're placing the blame on me when I specifically used the talkpage to prevent an edit war. Look man, tomorrow's my birthday, so I'd really like it if my birthday present here is that my block is lifted. Considering no staff member ever gave me a warning for any of my three blocks, and didn't tell me I did anything wrong until after I was blocked, that seems very much like an abuse of power. 3*2 '''does not equal''' 14--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 12:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::Okay, this is getting really tiring, I've told you that the ban depends on '''how many edits both offending parties had in the edit war''', in this case, '''seven'''. Since it's your second block '''due''' to edit warring, the time is '''double'''. 7*2 '''does equal''' 14. You participated in a war twice already (actually three times, but you had a perfectly good reason once and we didn't think you should get punished for reverting a guy who was replacing the redirect with a somewhat empty article). Jo blocked you in that opportunity, she was trying to make you two stop, because you were more than edit warring, you were actually in a quarrel, so she gave you and Satoshi a three day cooldown. '''Not even a full week'''. I'm going through the path of edit war (one day per reverted edit, I think I already mentioned it, and this is your second block because of it, I think I mentioned it too). You are showing an extreme case of denial and I don't see why I should lift your block (this is no longer in my hands since you already e-mailed a member of the Editorial Board, they'll get to it soon). Regarding the talk page, I told him he should have waited until a consensus was reached, something he understood, he will now try to be more careful regarding that. Your birthday is on January 31st? [http://bmgf.bulbagarden.net/members/57170.html Could have sworn it was on August 10th]. In any case, I still won't lift your block, that's up to the EB from now on. Regarding your claim that nobody warned you, [[bp:User_talk:SandmanDP#Recent_edits_on_Emily_Jenness|if this isn't any sort of a warning, then I don't know what it is]]. Trust me, this isn't abusing our power, it's just endorsing the Bulbapedia policies, which is what Administrators are for. I am no longer replying to this in Archives, should you want to keep at it, use the e-mail feature, but if you try to appeal here again and not the aforementioned proper procedure, I'll have to ban your Archives account to expire at the same time than your Bulbapedia account, and all further blocks will be replicated across all Bulbawikis, I saw you undo Pattyman who was doing the right thing, and even Kogs, but that's another story. [[User:Masatoshi|<span style="color: #224a9a"><b><span style="color: #2b5fc7">M</span>asatoshi</b></span>]][[User_talk:Masatoshi|<span style="color: #118eb2"><sub><small>''talk''</small></sub></span>]] 15:55, 30 January 2012 (UTC) | |||