User talk:Force Fire

Anime screenshots

As the common guideline goes, please upload anime screenshots in .png format, not in .jpg format. Thank you. UltimateSephiroth 12:52, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Charmander and Charmeleon images

Your images of Ash's Charmander and Charmeleon are worse quality than the ones we had before. Could you try to make them better quality? ^Chocolate 17:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, I can't seem to find better Images of them. Pokémon websites around the internet are useless. (Except for this one)....--Force Fire 01:02, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry. I can get some better quality images of them. ^Chocolate 01:09, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Bulbagarden Archives, Force Fire. Please read the checklist when you upload media files, and be sure to tag and categorize all images. Maverick Nate 02:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

HEY GUESS WHAT

Pocketmonsters! They hate us! Let's not get Sunain all pissy at me again! TTEchidna 03:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

-_-;--Force Fire 03:29, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes! Feel bad! Because Sunain's seriously that pissy. TTEchidna 07:55, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Names

Plural names are simply the Species name, no s. Maverick Nate 12:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

silver sprite

all gen i and gen ii sprite are in 56x56 format. the image is stretched after uploading a new image, but it will become normal in a few days -Pokeant 14:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Routes 47 and 48

We can't use those images. For obvious reasons. —darklord trom 10:37, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

RB art

Where'd you find them? The source may be of great use!--Mew a.k.a. Immewnity 12:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Psypokes.... I think....--Force Fire 08:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Yup... thanks!--Mew a.k.a. Immewnity 23:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Found a better source, though they're all jpgs... here. Just letting you know.--Mew a.k.a. Immewnity 23:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

It's ok, but the artifacts are all around the Pokémon (especially Ivysaur).--Force Fire 07:02, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

We already have a better Ivysaur pic, though.--Mew a.k.a. Immewnity 00:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Stadium

Everything goes into Category:Stadium If you could also remove from the images the two categories I deleted, that would be appreciated. ^Maverick _Nate 17:26, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Got through some of them.--Force Fire 08:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey, can you also create transparent images of these images? Thanks. ^ht 14 03:20, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

I'll try--Force Fire 07:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Now that Template:Stadium model is coded the way it should be, go around and subst it again on all those pages. ^Maverick _Nate 15:58, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Uhm, FF, I guess you missed putting subst: as Nate instructed.. You know, templates with headings (with ==whatever==) lets user edit the template which is bad, that's why we need to subst: it. Thanks, Kev zo8 11:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Oops, didn't realize that.--Force Fire 11:37, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey, question. Is there only one sprite of Unown for Stadium 2 or are all 26 of them there? If so, upload them all. I'll "revive" the template if that's the case. ^ht 14 05:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

That's what I was thinking to myself too. I'm not sure if there is though.--Force Fire 09:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Reverting the edit

I reverted the edit on Kogoro's talk page because the second sockpuppet of his said the same thing as his first one, topic-wise, which I found to be spam prior to your revert. There must have been a rule regarding which item is actually spam. Pattyman (talk) 04:58, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

I only reverted it because I didn't see it as spam. I'd rather wait for Kogoro to decide what to do.--Force Fire (talk) 05:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

I was going to wait too after I did my part. Pattyman (talk) 05:11, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Anime move images with the Generation V and below spelling

Do you want the anime move images, the ones that existed in Generation V and below, to be in the Generation VI spelling? The spelling itself was like that on the Bulbapedia side. You can discuss this with other staff if you want. Pattyman (talk) 03:28, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

I'd say just leave it be.--Force Fire (talk) 09:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Ok. Pattyman (talk) 21:07, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Help for Season 1 opening screenshot

In the File:OPE01.png, I have uploaded a brighter DVD source version but it's not showing not that bright and showing it as it was before. When I reverted it then the history small image in that image history was showing that bright. Then when I again reverted it it was still not showing bright. I uploaded and reverted them yesterday but today still it's not showing bright. Why is that happening? Yash Sen (talk) 08:59, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Whoa! I think that now it's okay! Yash Sen (talk) 09:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Request

Could you please revert the Ash Talonflame Flame Charge image back to the previous one, because I found one that shows it making contact and still shows Talonflame using it and you said that it's fine to show moves making contact if they are physical in nature and the one I found was, but it's been reverted twice now. You can basically tell it's Talonflame in both pictures, but what's wrong with having one that is making contact? Playerking95 (talk) 14:33, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

I did not say that it was better, I said it was optional. Again, why does it even matter if it's making contact? When I said physical moves are fine, that was on an "if" clause. As in, if the previous image was bad, low quality/has a logo, then yes you can change the image, and whether the Pokemon is making contact or not in your image, it does not matter. As long as the new image is a better quality picture than the last.

However, if the previous image is fine, then there's no need to change it just because the one you have is making contact. Because like I said, why does it matter?.--Force Fire (talk) 15:10, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Because you said moves like High Jump Kick and such are fine, you never said it could only be if the previous image was significantly worse, so that's not my fault that those specifics were left out and it should better for PHYSICAL moves to show them PHYSICALLY making contact. Playerking95 (talk) 15:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Force Fire never said that contact moves making contact in pictures was a priority - a better quality picture validates over everything and anything - how is that so hard to understand? O.o--ShallowShaddoll (talk) 15:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Okay, you are not apart of this conversation, so don't enter it. And he did say it was okay, because as I said, he never said it was only if the previous image was of poor quality so I understand everything that is being said, I just can't understand things when they're not being said, so I don't think you understand. Playerking95 (talk) 15:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

It should be common sense, you don't just replace a perfectly okay image to fit your views. That, quite simply, is petty.--Force Fire (talk) 15:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Not really and you never implied that it had to be like that. I'm sorry for thinking that, but I don't see how that is common sense. For example, so it's not okay if it's just a simple change to improve it? So I guess if there was a great quality of an image with a logo and then someone uploaded the same one without the logo, then that wouldn't be worth changing? Physical moves should be made to show them making contact, because physicality is all about making contact. Playerking95 (talk) 15:30, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

The image's purpose is to show what the move looks like in the anime. It making contact is optional. An official rule (no logos) severely outweighs a minor, if trivial, opinion.--Force Fire (talk) 15:41, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

(edit conflict) For what it's worth, I agree with ShallowShaddoll that your proposed new version of the Flame Charge image is actually of a worse quality than the previous version (the image as a whole is blurrer, and contains compression artefacts), so I don't see the improvement that you are suggesting. Had it been an image of objectively higher quality and also depicts the move making contact, fine; however, this is not the case. This is a wiki, and as the tagline of Bulbapedia suggests, "community-driven", so I will weigh in on such matters as I please, until another staff member tells me otherwise.

"he never said it was only if the previous image was of poor quality" - at this point, I think you are simply wikilawyering. Do you really think that "making contact" trumps "technical quality", and if so, do we really have to go to the ridiculous extent of codifying this in policy? Chenzw (talk) 15:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

@Playerking: You cannot force people out of conversations. If you don not know how wikias work in general, maybe you should not be contributing in one?--ShallowShaddoll (talk) 15:45, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

At Force Fire: But making contact isn't something trivial, or at the very least, shouldn't be considered.

At Chenzw: For what it's worth, I don't care who you agree with and this is between me and Force Fire, since I was asking him something and not you and as I've said, the image isn't worse and quite frankly, the image from the Wulfric battle is of a pretty blurry quality to me and artefacts aren't that important, so stop nitpicking at things that don't need to be and as I've said, the conversation isn't between him, myself and you. I want a moderator's voice on this, not a normal user's.

At Shallowshaddoll or whatever, I've been here a lot longer than you, or at the very least have been editing here longer than you have, so I know what a wikia is, but as I've said, I came her for one persons voice and that isn't yours and don't suggest for me to leave, because I'm just going to suggest for you to leave, because this is a community and communities should respect peoples opinions and should not harassing people, which I feel you are doing. Playerking95 (talk) 15:54, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

"Okay, you are not apart of this conversation, so don't enter it.". But you did. *facepalm* Whut? You're harrasing me and completely ignoring everyones opinions and suddenly you're the victim..? Whutt!? O.O--ShallowShaddoll (talk) 15:56, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

(resetting indent)It is trivial if that's your sole purpose of replacing a perfectly fine image. That's basically all it boils down to. Don't change a perfectly fine image to fit your views. The only reason you would change a perfectly fine image is if it's taken from a newer series or if the animation is different from before.--Force Fire (talk) 16:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

At ShallowShaddoll: I didn't enter into anyone else's conversation, this was one I started with Force Fire because I wanted to talk to him about something, so there's no need for any "face-palm" and if there is, it's for not knowing how to spell the word "what". 2. I never harassed you, I was just stating my opinion and you attacked me by quoting what Force Fire said to me and not even bothering to read the other thing that he said and now you are injecting yourself here, when it isn't necessary, so yes, I am the victim here.

At Force Fire, as I have said numerous times, I don't consider it trivial because the whole point of a physical move is its physicality, so to show how it looks, despite it not being used yet, since it hasn't made contact and I don't think it's a perfectly fine image, because it does lot a bit blurry and the one with Avalugg has a logo, so why can't one without a logo be added? You said that logo omissions are fine, but for some reason me adding one that doesn't have one and that shows one of the main cornerstones of a physical move being used isn't fine? Why does that make sense? Playerking95 (talk) 16:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

And that's your opinion. Bottom line is, you can't just an perfectly fine image because you don't like. The logo in the Avalugg image was obscured by the flame, so I didn't see it on first notice. If you want to change it because it has a logo, fine. But for the Thunderbolt image (which was why I brought this whole thing up in the first place) is perfectly fine the way it is and does not need to be changed.--Force Fire (talk) 07:04, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Bulbapedia block

Hello. I have to use your Archives talk page because I can't email you (i.e. the function “email this user” is hidden). Because of my block on Bulbapedia, I have just to say you that I did those edits on Bikini Miltank and abcboy's userpages justly. The reason I edited Bikini Miltank's userpage is that their userpage, although it had Babel tags, the userpage was not placed in the prop er cat egor ies. The reason I edited abcboy's userpage is that he itself introduces in the title section with his username being lowercase. This is also the case on the project pages where abcboy is mentioned.

Block made by Force Fire

Start of block: 06:13, 23 October 2019

Expiration of block: 05:13, 6 November 2019

Intended blocked user: TheICTLiker4

IP address: 89.74.214.203

Block ID: #59613

Reason: Insubordination

Thank you for reading. Well, I'm VERY sorry for editing The dark lord trombonator's talk page... --TheICTLiker4^{piszże do mnie} 18:14, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Please unblock me, pretty, pretty, pretty, please!

Please unblock me on Bulbapedia, Force Fire. I won't abuse multiple accounts ANYMORE! I pinkie swear PROMISE!S