User talk:Maverick Nate/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

User talk:Maverick Nate/Archive 1 (view source)

493 bytes added , 30 October 2008

m

no edit summary

5,528

edits

Revision as of 16:36, 30 October 2008 (view source) Chocolate (talk \| contribs) (→‎Why?: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:41, 30 October 2008 (view source) Shiningpikablu252 (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 127:		Line 127:

	Why did you revert my uploads of the card images? Mine were bigger and better quality. <sup><big>[[user:chocolate\|<span style="color:#6D351A;">Cho</span>]][[user talk:chocolate\|<span style="color:#6D351A;">col</span>]][[special:contributions/chocolate\|<span style="color:#6D351A;">ate</span>]]</big></sup> 16:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)		Why did you revert my uploads of the card images? Mine were bigger and better quality. <sup><big>[[user:chocolate\|<span style="color:#6D351A;">Cho</span>]][[user talk:chocolate\|<span style="color:#6D351A;">col</span>]][[special:contributions/chocolate\|<span style="color:#6D351A;">ate</span>]]</big></sup> 16:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

			:And site-stamped. Site-stamps are a big no-no when it comes to card images. If a card image has a site stamp on it, that image goes, size and quality do not matter in this case. Even attempting to cover up a site stamp doesn't change the fact that the site stamp is there; there was a Dark Dragonair image deleted because the uploader had blacked out a {{bp\|Pokébeach}} site stamp to try to keep the image up. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252\|Shiningpikablu252]] 16:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)