1,089
edits
User talk:Force Fire: Difference between revisions
→Request
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
::::::Not really and you never implied that it had to be like that. I'm sorry for thinking that, but I don't see how that is common sense. For example, so it's not okay if it's just a simple change to improve it? So I guess if there was a great quality of an image with a logo and then someone uploaded the same one without the logo, then that wouldn't be worth changing? Physical moves should be made to show them making contact, because physicality is all about making contact. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 15:30, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ::::::Not really and you never implied that it had to be like that. I'm sorry for thinking that, but I don't see how that is common sense. For example, so it's not okay if it's just a simple change to improve it? So I guess if there was a great quality of an image with a logo and then someone uploaded the same one without the logo, then that wouldn't be worth changing? Physical moves should be made to show them making contact, because physicality is all about making contact. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 15:30, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::::::The image's purpose is to show '''what the move looks like in the anime'''. It making contact is '''optional'''. An official rule (no logos) severely outweighs a minor, if trivial, opinion.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 15:41, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | :::::::The image's purpose is to show '''what the move looks like in the anime'''. It making contact is '''optional'''. An official rule (no logos) severely outweighs a minor, if trivial, opinion.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 15:41, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::::::(edit conflict) For what it's worth, I agree with ShallowShaddoll that your proposed new version of the Flame Charge image is actually of a '''worse''' quality than the previous version (the image as a whole is blurrer, and contains compression artefacts), so I don't see the improvement that you are suggesting. Had it been an image of objectively higher quality '''and''' also depicts the move making contact, fine; however, this is not the case. This is a wiki, and as the tagline of Bulbapedia suggests, "community-driven", so I will weigh in on such matters as I please, until another staff member tells me otherwise. | |||
::::::::"he never said it was only if the previous image was of poor quality" - at this point, I think you are simply [[wp:WP:LAWYER|wikilawyering]]. Do you really think that "making contact" trumps "technical quality", and if so, do we really have to go to the ridiculous extent of codifying this in policy? [[User:Chenzw|Chenzw]] ([[User talk:Chenzw|talk]]) 15:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | |||