1,651
edits
User talk:Playerking95: Difference between revisions
→Permanent block warning: Today I learned that template:indent isn't a thing here.
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
Force Fire (talk | contribs) (→Permanent block warning: Today I learned that template:indent isn't a thing here.) |
||
| Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
:::::::Those weren't the only options, because there's nothing wrong with reverting. I'm allowed to revert and no one has said otherwise and I don't think I should be made to follow any specific rule, when I've done nothing wrong. I have DISCUSSED before and that's after I have reverted an image (and rightfully so, when the other image wasn't exactly up to standards) and that change was reverted by someone else. One revert isn't an edit war, especially when it was meant to be something final, and there was a belief that it wouldn't be reverted and turn into a war, which, if it did, as I said, there would be a discussion. So, I don't see how one little revert is doing anything any harm, when others are allowed to and others have done the same thing I have, reverting images multiple times in an edit war fashion, which I don't do anymore. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 01:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC) | :::::::Those weren't the only options, because there's nothing wrong with reverting. I'm allowed to revert and no one has said otherwise and I don't think I should be made to follow any specific rule, when I've done nothing wrong. I have DISCUSSED before and that's after I have reverted an image (and rightfully so, when the other image wasn't exactly up to standards) and that change was reverted by someone else. One revert isn't an edit war, especially when it was meant to be something final, and there was a belief that it wouldn't be reverted and turn into a war, which, if it did, as I said, there would be a discussion. So, I don't see how one little revert is doing anything any harm, when others are allowed to and others have done the same thing I have, reverting images multiple times in an edit war fashion, which I don't do anymore. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 01:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
Playerking... please take a look at the history section of the Jessie's Mimikyu file and tell me how many times '''your''' name appears with the word '''reverted''' next to it. You have '''clearly''' not reverted only once. Yes, there is everything wrong with reverting, especially in your case when you're a serial reverter. You are allowed to replace an image, but '''not''' revert someone just because you have a different opinion. You have '''not''' discussed anything with Rahl. You '''never''' discuss anything with '''anyone'''. You just run around reverting around because you just simply have the power to. And yes, you are made to follow a specific rule for you because "taking stuff to the talk page rather then reverting" seems to be such an abstract concept for you to comprehend that it had to come down to this. Sorry for being so hard, but this is the kind of harsh reality you need before you get yourself permanently blocked.--[[User:Force Fire|Force Fire]] ([[User talk:Force Fire|talk]]) 06:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC) | |||